2012 London Olympic Games Construction Essay

2012 London majestic Games building EssayMy report is found on the 2012 prodigious Games externalise in London, the selected contractor submitted detailed documentation and labour expound which were evaluated reviewed by the clients. All the documents deal with all type of administrative procedure, procurement strategy among others.The report also explained all items multiform in the social organization industry coming from the project history, the pre-construction and post-construction stage. This report will bene run into the client as to the successful completion of the project due to organize administrative procedure of procurement strategy.1.2 Project Brief or HistoryThe London 2012 Olympic Games, the Project Brief was a high level document that outlined the objectives and operational requirements for each project. As the project progressed by and through the different Royal constitute of British Architects (RIBA) stages of the architectural plan process, the brie f was developed to formInitial BriefDesign briefProject BriefThe initial brief was used to engraft out the initial ODA requirements of the project and certain the development of the design through RIBA design stages A/B. It captured the data from the Project Initial Document and the London Organizing military commission of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) Venue Requirements and described what the Design team was required.The design brief defined what will be the next phase of the project that should be delivered and informed the RIBA Stages C/D. It focused on the technical requirements and the measurable criteria defined during Design development.The Project BriefThe London 2012 Olympic Games projects be including 1 to 10 milepost base as belowMilestone -01, social organisation of the Olympic StadiumMilestone -02, Construction of the Aquatics inwardnessMilestone -03, Construction of the VelodromeMilestone -04, Construction of the International Broadcast Centre/M ain Press Centre(IBC/MPC)Milestone -05, Construction of the Handball and Basketball ArenasMilestone -06, Construction of the Lee Valley White Water CentreMilestone -07, Construction work on Eton Manor and the Royal Artillery BarracksMilestone -08, The External Structure of the Olympic VillageMilestone -09, Construction of all Permanent BridgesMilestone -10, Construction work at Stratford StationIncluding the project photo Appendix -BUnder the Project Brief, the following ar includeProject Name- 2012 London Olympic gamesProject Value- 9,298m-the Public Sector Funding PackageContract Period Construction took four years from 2007 to 2011.Project procurement Method- design and buildAwarded Main Contractor Name-Sir Robert McAlpineBarr ConstructionCarillionISGBalfour BeattyConsultant Name ArchitectPopulousWilkinson Eyre Architects KSS Design GroupHopkins Architects, Grant AssociatesZaha Hadid ArchitectsStructural and services engineers, meanBuro HappoldExpedition EngineeringHyland Ed gar DriverOve Arup quislings, BDSPSKMSavilles Hepher DixonProject client IOC, LOCOG, ODA, Lee Valley Regional Park Authority,02. Chapter2.1. Identified Various People / OrganisationsLondon 2012 Olympic Games Organizations involved in key Project StakeholdersOlympic oral communication Authority (OAD)The London Organizing Committee of the Olympics Games (LOCOG)The Greater London Authority (GLA)British Olympic Association (BOA)The organization (MPA, 2006).And also in additionalThe Mayor of LondonOlympic Park bequest connectionLondon emergence Agency (LDA)British Paralympic Association (BPA)The Olympic Board (OB)International Olympic Committee (IOC)International Paralympic Committee (IPC).Their main functions be to collectively advice and provide assurance to the board (MPA, 2006). These stakeholders hit different perceptions as to what constitute success. While they all have different responsibilities towards the success of the game, their individual objectives has to be met. It is worth noting that their varying objectives were well reconciled as per the game. Shared appreciation was created among them and reconciliation of objectives was easy because one of the predominant overarching aims of both the UK government and IOC for the games is sustainability among the Consultant, the main Contractor, the Sub-Contractor and the Supplier.The more details including the Appendix-A2.2. Financing Structure/Final CostThe financing structures are two distinct medical prognosiss of the London 2012 Olympic Games, the preparation for the games by the ODA and LOCOG operational work out running the games.The Secretary of state for culture, media and sport announced, in an oral program line to the abode, that the budget for the preparation of the 2012 London Olympics had increased from an initial estimate budget of 2.375 one thousand million, at the eon of the bid the estimated cost of the Games was 4 billion 3 billion for the Olympic Park and an agent for eli te and community sport and 1 billion as part of the wider Lower Lea Valley regeneration (excluding rate and wider security costs).Following a review by the Government a revised funding cost was announced in March 2007 of 9.325billion, as details below Table-01.The Budget as Announced for the Games on 15 March 2007 decimal point translationAmount Million ()1Core Olympic cost -Olympic Delivery Authority(ODA)3,081.002Infrastructure and regeneration costs associated with the Olympic park and other venues1,673.003Contingency (Excluding Tax)500.004 natural ( Net of Tax )(1+2+3)5,254.005Other (Non ODA),Olympic Cost388.00Other ProvisionsPolicing and Wider Security600.00Tax (on ODA Costs)836.00General programme Contingency (including tax)2,247.006Total Provisions3,683.00Grand Total (4+5+6)9,325.00 general Revised Budget9,325.00Table -01The 2012 Olympic Games over-all budget (9.325 cardinal () were distributed to all stockholders and impartmarized as follows on Table-02.Public Funding Ava ilableItemDescriptionAmount Billion ()1Exchequer5.9752National Lottery2.1753Greater London Authority0.9254London Development Agency0.250Total Cost(1+2+3+4)9.325Table -02However, on 24 March 2010, the Awarded budget was reduced to 27m and breakdown as follows Table 03ItemDescriptionAmount Million ()1Olympic Delivery Authority(ODA)ODA Base Cost Including VAT6,100.00Programme Contingency968.00Funders Contingency1,004.00Total Available to ODA8,072.002Non-Olympic Delivery Authority(ODA)Elite and Community Sports290.00Paralympic Games66.00Look of London32.00Security600.00Security Contingency238.00Total Non ODA1,226.003Total Public Sector Funding Package (1+2)9,298.00Overall Original Budget9,298.00Table -03The 2012 Olympic Games over-all Revised budget (9.298 Billion () were distributed to all stockholders and summarized as follows on Table-04.Sources of FundingItemDescriptionAmount Billion ()1National Lottery2.1752London (GLA and LDA)0.8753Central Government6.248Total Cost(1+2+3)9.298Tab le -04Unveiling the governments final quarterly budget update, the sports minister, Hugh Robertson, said that at a conservative estimate the final cost of the Games would be 8.921billion against an overall original budget of 9.298billion2.3. Project Procurement Structure/methodological analysisThe specific new construction of Olympic stadium, the project leadership has been established, and then the procurement method will be accepted. The project was procured on a design and build basis.A method where the contractor is responsible for undertaking both the design and the construction of the work in return for a lump sum price.There are variants on this option depending on the degree to which initial design is included in the clients requirements. Appointment of a contractor is often by two stages tendering, thus keeping a competitive element, but not expecting every tenderer to produce full proposals. The clients requirements can cut back from a simple adjustment schedule to a ful ly worked out scheme design, but generally should be matched by the contractors proposalFor design and build procurement there are three main types of contractPackage Deal or Turnkey ContractDesign and Build Contracts Contractors Design ObligationsContractors Design for Specific Elements OnlyThe project procurement plan includes the followingSourcing materials with low embodied carbonMinimizing waste at source, promoting use of secondary materialsPolicies on ecoEcologically sensitive materials e.g Timber and victualsEthical procurement and fair employmentSourcing wellnessy materials and ensuring health and safety on post (ODA, 20091)The procurement plan is being implemented by a rigorous procurement process. All partners and collaborators will have to meet individual and overall criteria in order to contribute to the successful government issue of the plan. This will have to be made visible through product and service supply, engagement in relevant projects, promotion of behavio ral change, consumers, employees and supply chains (ODA, 2009).2.4. Main Forms of Construction Contract/ pinnace DocumentThe New Engineering Contract (NEC) was used to facilitate all the necessary documents during the bidding and awarding stage. Both parties, the Client and the Contractor, hold and closed the project based on the NEC contract.The NEC3 suite of contracts was selected because it provided the following key attributes in response to ODA, s Requirements.A flexible approach, providing a range of contract solutions relative to the level of design information available and procurement option being considered.The pro-active management of risk as an inherent and fundamental element of the entire contract forms.A collaborative approach back up timely delivery, which is fundamental to ODA.Full visibility of cost (Except under option a contracts), supporting effective programme budget management.ODA has number of obligations under the London Olympic Games Act 2006, particularl y around risk, brand protection and stakeholder rights, which necessitated changes to the standard NEC3 Contract Forms. These changes included, supernumerary collateral warranties for key interested partiesRestrictions in change of ownership of tier 1 contractorsEnhanced conflict of interest provisionsItemsNEC3 Contract and election use of goods and servicesRationale1Engineering and Construction Contract Option- C (Target contract with activity schedule)Major and complex venues and infrastructureTarget price was best fit to developing specification2Engineering and Construction Contract Option- A ( Priced contract with activity schedule)Other venuesDesigns were firm allowing cost certainty3 termination Service Contrcat Option -A ( Priced contract with activity schedule)Logistics and security contractsPricing schedules accommodated required flexibility in both volume of services required and scale ( through enhanced services schedules)The New Engineering Contract 2005 version 3 Engin eering and Construction Contract recommends that the various methods of specifying the works should be adoptedOption A C Activity ScheduleOption B D Bill of QuantitiesOption E F A traditional Specifications or rough drawingThe Olympic Delivery Authority used procurement through e-procurement system and methodology, particularly an evaluation system to enable delivery of its policy objectives and ambitions as followsSustainability and LegacyDesign and AccessibilityEquality and InclusionEmployment and SkillsHealth, Safety and SecurityDelivery of London Olympic Stadium in Time, Cost and QualityTender documentations areActivity scheduleMethod statementWorking drawingBOQQuantified SpecificationWork Schedules ( the word Item denotes pricing)Specification + Contract Sum epitome or Schedule of Rates03. Chapter3.1. Construction Technology ChallengesThe London 2012 Olympic Games project was constructed with many construction challenges and new construction technologies. Some of which are as follows Low-carbon concrete with 40 percent less embodied carbon was used for concreting structures.Surplus gas pipes were used to build the top ring of the Stadium.Recycled containers were used as toilet facilities.Demolished existing structures were placed on top of the ground that served as a solid base for the construction.To reduce the loads on the project, 75 percent lightweight steel materials were utilized in the construction.As part of the landscaping works. 500,000 plants were planted in the Olympic Parks wetland areasDue to new technologies that were adopted, plainly 10,000 tons of steel were used.Tensile roofings were used as to cover the ground bowl-like stadium.The project settled at 2,821 feet perimeter land and stands at 197 feet high.The Delivery Partner was comprised of three construction industry leaders, who were responsible for the construction of all new venues and infrastructure needed for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The Olympic Park wil l house nine state-of-the-art venues including the Olympic stadium, velodrome and aquatics center. New Technology was used to fast track the project and attained the completion date of the Project.As the time is the essence, the constructions were done on a 24 hour basis as the design required new methodology to meet the criteria of the Project SpecificationsMethodological challenges that are anticipated includeAchieving adequate coverage of project-level evaluations, within the bounds of practicality, across bequest and sub-legacy themes, geography, demographics, project size/type etcThe complexity of the task and the interdependencies that exist among outcomes and impacts of different projects and programmesThe aggregation and synthesis of different measures and indicators, which may also be of varying qualityAssessing the impact and additionality of interventions in a consistent fashionEnsuring value for money and benefits are being measured or estimated using credible evidenceM easuring intangible impacts using experimental measures such as infixed well-being and through custom techniques such as media content analysisMeasuring wider strategic impacts and added value generated through coordination of the organisations involved in planning and delivering legacy3.2. Health and Safety Records/AchievementThe HSE has published the first in a series of research reports on the London 2012 Olympics as part of a concert effort to circulate the health and safety lessons learned from the Stratford project among the wider construction industry.There are so many magnificent aspects of London 2012 when it comes to Safety issues and this was achieved through the excellent safety study, especially during the construction phase.The park was built with zero construction fatalities. It shows the approaches to gain a good occupational Safety and Health. Some of the achievements are as followsThe Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) honored the Olympic Deli very Authority in a ceremony.More than 12,500 workers helped construct the venues and the Big Build of the site was hailed as the safest construction of an Olympic Stadium.The Executive started working with the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) soon after London was awarded the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games and set out liberate targets of what standards were expected, encouraging strong leadership and sharing of good practice. Up to this month, the HSE has received reports of only 114 injuries and eight dangerous occurrences that occurred during the projects 66 million hours of work.And also the ODAs commitment to health and safety has been recognised by the British Safety Council (BSC) with its 5-star award, following an independent, rigorous audit of the ODAs health and safety management system and processes, in which the ODA received a score of 98 per cent.The ODA was also awarded the Sword of Honour, one of the most prestigious international health and safety accolades that an organization can receive, which is designed to encourage and vantage organizations that work to best practice. All applicants must have already received 5 stars from the BSC04. Chapter4.1. ConclusionBased on the above submission, it can be reason that the Construction of the facilities needed for the 2012 London Olympic Games were successfully done and completed to the satisfaction of the Client. This achievement was due to the followingThorough evaluation of the Project Requirements as reviewed and evaluated by the Client.An organized procurement strategy within the UK and International market environments.Teamwork and coordination among the stakeholdersUtilizing the familiar form of contract in UKProper implementation of all construction methodology accepted in the construction industry.Proper planning and implementation to meet the required completion date.Utilizing new construction technologies and materials.Likewise, a complete record for health and safety were properly org anized. A strict implementation of a Safety Plan were followed resulting to no fatalities or major injuries recorded.With respect to the financial aspect of the project, variation orders and cost were not clearly indicated as this will have a big impact on the total and final cost of the project involved.Nevertheless, the over-all aspect of the report can be recommended as it clearly shows that all necessary strategies and construction methodology will have a successful outcome as expected by the client specifically the completion of the project as per the time schedule, work quality and project cost.05. Chapter5.1. BibliographyOlayide Mutiu Adedeji, Senior Quantity Surveyor, February 20,2013Company CEG InternationalContact Tel- +974-44551188Fax +974-44551144 netmail emailprotectedWeb www.ceg-qatar.comPost P.O. Box -3973, capital of Qatar QatarMohamed Azhar, Senior Quantity Surveyor, February 22,2013Company CEG InternationalContact Tel +974-44551188Fax +974-44551144E-Mail emailp rotectedWeb www.ceg-qatar.comPost P.O. Box -3973, Doha QatarElajun E. Custodio, Civil Engineer, March 20,2013Company CEG InternationalContact Tel- +974-44551188Fax +974-44551144E-Mail emailprotectedWeb www.ceg-qatar.comPost P.O. Box -3973, Doha QatarMahmud Anees Senior Quantity Surveyor, March 15,2013Company KESOContact E-Mail anees yahoo.comWeb www.ceg-qatar.comPost P.O. Box -3973, Doha Qatar